Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Artem Bondarenko remove | Thelo Aasgaard remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 25 | 24 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | FC Shakhtar Donetsk · Premier Liga | Rangers FC · Scottish Premiership |
| League strength | 0.25 | 0.31 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1420 | 1427 |
| League minutes | 1718 (64%) | 1515 (51%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.47 | 0.47 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 64 | 50 |
| Market value | €8.0M | €2.8M |
| Estimated acquisition | €3.5M – €8.0M | €1.2M – €3.7M |
| Model value | €1.6M – €10.2M | €1.4M – €7.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €3.2M – €10.1M | €1.4M – €5.0M |
| Bargain Index | 20/100 | 67/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€3.5M – €8.0M Model value (performance-implied)€1.6M – €10.2M Projected value (24 months)€3.2M – €10.1M Dashed line: current market value (€8.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.2M – €3.7M Model value (performance-implied)€1.4M – €7.5M Projected value (24 months)€1.4M – €5.0M Dashed line: current market value (€2.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Artem Bondarenko and Thelo Aasgaard
- Aasgaard is estimated to cost far less (€2.4M vs €6.4M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Aasgaard (Bargain Index 67 vs 20) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.