Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Ibe Hautekiet remove | Redouane Halhal remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 24 | 23 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | Standard Liège · Jupiler Pro League | KV Mechelen · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1341 | 1370 |
| League minutes | 2047 (76%) | 2039 (76%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 40 | 40 |
| Market value | €4.0M | €5.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.9M – €5.3M | €2.5M – €7.5M |
| Model value | €901k – €3.0M | €865k – €3.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.7M – €5.0M | €2.8M – €10.5M |
| Bargain Index | 30/100 | 91/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.9M – €5.3M Model value (performance-implied)€901k – €3.0M Projected value (24 months)€1.7M – €5.0M Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€2.5M – €7.5M Model value (performance-implied)€865k – €3.5M Projected value (24 months)€2.8M – €10.5M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Ibe Hautekiet and Redouane Halhal
- On value for money the model prefers Halhal (Bargain Index 91 vs 30) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Hautekiet Low, Halhal Moderate.