Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Yannick Cappelle removeDanila Vedernikov remove
Age2225
PositionLeft-backLeft-back
Club · leagueZulte Waregem · Jupiler Pro LeagueFC Orenburg · Premier Liga
League strength0.650.56
Team strength (Elo)12281218
League minutes1757 (65%)1658 (61%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.100.05
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.150.13
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile1411
Market value€650k€750k
Estimated acquisition€262k – €1.2M€219k – €678k
Model value€482k – €1.1M€410k – €879k
Projected value (24m)€323k – €1.6M€358k – €1.3M
Bargain Index71/10095/100
DevelopmentHighLow
Breakout probability30%n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighVery High
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€262k – €1.2M
Model value (performance-implied)€482k – €1.1M
Projected value (24 months)€323k – €1.6M
Dashed line: current market value (€650k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€219k – €678k
Model value (performance-implied)€410k – €879k
Projected value (24 months)€358k – €1.3M
Dashed line: current market value (€750k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Yannick Cappelle and Danila Vedernikov

  • Cappelle is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Vedernikov is estimated to cost far less (€292k vs €617k mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Vedernikov (Bargain Index 95 vs 71) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Cappelle High, Vedernikov Very High.