Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Ayase Ueda removeLuka Jović remove
Age2728
PositionStrikerStriker
Club · leagueFeyenoord Rotterdam · EredivisieAthlitiki Enosi Konstantinoupoleos · Super League 1
League strength0.430.42
Team strength (Elo)14231512
League minutes2534 (83%)1866 (80%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.960.82
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.520.46
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile6876
Market value€17.0M€9.0M
Estimated acquisition€11.4M – €22.2M€3.5M – €9.4M
Model value€2.4M – €10.1M€4.0M – €17.3M
Projected value (24m)€8.2M – €17.7M€3.5M – €9.0M
Bargain Index12/10084/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskLowModerate
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€11.4M – €22.2M
Model value (performance-implied)€2.4M – €10.1M
Projected value (24 months)€8.2M – €17.7M
Dashed line: current market value (€17.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€3.5M – €9.4M
Model value (performance-implied)€4.0M – €17.3M
Projected value (24 months)€3.5M – €9.0M
Dashed line: current market value (€9.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Ayase Ueda and Luka Jović

  • Jović is estimated to cost far less (€4.7M vs €14.3M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Jović (Bargain Index 84 vs 12) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Ueda Low, Jović Moderate.