Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Ayase Ueda remove | Luka Jović remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 27 | 28 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | Feyenoord Rotterdam · Eredivisie | Athlitiki Enosi Konstantinoupoleos · Super League 1 |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.42 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1423 | 1512 |
| League minutes | 2534 (83%) | 1866 (80%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.96 | 0.82 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.46 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 68 | 76 |
| Market value | €17.0M | €9.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €11.4M – €22.2M | €3.5M – €9.4M |
| Model value | €2.4M – €10.1M | €4.0M – €17.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €8.2M – €17.7M | €3.5M – €9.0M |
| Bargain Index | 12/100 | 84/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€11.4M – €22.2M Model value (performance-implied)€2.4M – €10.1M Projected value (24 months)€8.2M – €17.7M Dashed line: current market value (€17.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€3.5M – €9.4M Model value (performance-implied)€4.0M – €17.3M Projected value (24 months)€3.5M – €9.0M Dashed line: current market value (€9.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Ayase Ueda and Luka Jović
- Jović is estimated to cost far less (€4.7M vs €14.3M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Jović (Bargain Index 84 vs 12) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Ueda Low, Jović Moderate.