Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Maxence Maisonneuve remove | Ferro remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 27 | 29 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | RAAL La Louvière · Jupiler Pro League | GD Estoril Praia · Liga Portugal |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.58 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1297 | 1305 |
| League minutes | 1917 (71%) | 1634 (53%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.05 | 0.11 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.06 | 0.10 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 26 | 31 |
| Market value | €600k | €1.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €227k – €690k | €339k – €859k |
| Model value | €491k – €992k | €410k – €1.2M |
| Projected value (24m) | €287k – €795k | €475k – €1.0M |
| Bargain Index | 67/100 | 88/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€227k – €690k Model value (performance-implied)€491k – €992k Projected value (24 months)€287k – €795k Dashed line: current market value (€600k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€339k – €859k Model value (performance-implied)€410k – €1.2M Projected value (24 months)€475k – €1.0M Dashed line: current market value (€1.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Maxence Maisonneuve and Ferro
- Maisonneuve was used far more by the club (71% of minutes vs 53%).
- On value for money the model prefers Ferro (Bargain Index 88 vs 67) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Maisonneuve Low, Ferro High.