Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Ricardo Pepi remove | Romeo Vermant remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 23 | 22 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | PSV Eindhoven · Eredivisie | Club Brugge KV · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1606 | 1589 |
| League minutes | 1415 (46%) | 1070 (40%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 1.08 | 0.76 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.39 | 0.45 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 67 | 63 |
| Market value | €30.0M | €9.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €22.9M – €41.4M | €6.8M – €15.6M |
| Model value | €6.0M – €14.6M | €4.5M – €11.7M |
| Projected value (24m) | €16.4M – €43.5M | €4.3M – €20.1M |
| Bargain Index | 13/100 | 54/100 |
| Development | Moderate | High |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | 25% |
| Risk | Moderate | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€22.9M – €41.4M Model value (performance-implied)€6.0M – €14.6M Projected value (24 months)€16.4M – €43.5M Dashed line: current market value (€30.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€6.8M – €15.6M Model value (performance-implied)€4.5M – €11.7M Projected value (24 months)€4.3M – €20.1M Dashed line: current market value (€9.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Ricardo Pepi and Romeo Vermant
- Vermant plays in a stronger league (0.65 vs 0.43); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
- Vermant is estimated to cost far less (€10.7M vs €34.2M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Vermant (Bargain Index 54 vs 13) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Pepi Moderate, Vermant High.