Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Artur Ryabov remove | Nika Gagnidze remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 25 | 25 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | LNZ Cherkasy · Premier Liga | Kolos Kovalivka · Premier Liga |
| League strength | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1242 | 1200 |
| League minutes | 2257 (84%) | 2158 (80%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.12 | 0.17 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 24 | 27 |
| Market value | €1.2M | €900k |
| Estimated acquisition | €524k – €1.4M | €269k – €837k |
| Model value | €494k – €1.2M | €441k – €1.6M |
| Projected value (24m) | €551k – €1.9M | €409k – €1.5M |
| Bargain Index | 82/100 | 97/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€524k – €1.4M Model value (performance-implied)€494k – €1.2M Projected value (24 months)€551k – €1.9M Dashed line: current market value (€1.2M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€269k – €837k Model value (performance-implied)€441k – €1.6M Projected value (24 months)€409k – €1.5M Dashed line: current market value (€900k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Artur Ryabov and Nika Gagnidze
- Gagnidze is estimated to cost far less (€358k vs €813k mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Gagnidze (Bargain Index 97 vs 82) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.