Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Fedde Leysen removeHan-beom Lee remove
Age2224
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueUnion Saint-Gilloise · Jupiler Pro LeagueFC Midtjylland · Superliga
League strength0.650.47
Team strength (Elo)15701562
League minutes1594 (59%)1479 (75%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.110.06
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.060.04
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile6956
Market value€3.5M€3.0M
Estimated acquisition€2.0M – €5.4M€1.4M – €4.5M
Model value€3.5M – €14.2M€2.0M – €5.5M
Projected value (24m)€2.3M – €7.4M€2.1M – €6.8M
Bargain Index76/10098/100
DevelopmentHighModerate
Breakout probability30%n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€2.0M – €5.4M
Model value (performance-implied)€3.5M – €14.2M
Projected value (24 months)€2.3M – €7.4M
Dashed line: current market value (€3.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€1.4M – €4.5M
Model value (performance-implied)€2.0M – €5.5M
Projected value (24 months)€2.1M – €6.8M
Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Fedde Leysen and Han-beom Lee

  • Leysen plays in a stronger league (0.65 vs 0.47); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Lee was used far more by the club (75% of minutes vs 59%).
  • Lee is estimated to cost far less (€1.9M vs €3.5M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Lee (Bargain Index 98 vs 76) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Leysen Moderate, Lee High.