Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Maestro remove | Bartuğ Elmaz remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 22 | 23 |
| Position | Defensive midfielder | Defensive midfielder |
| Club · league | Alanyaspor · Super Lig | Fatih Karagümrük · Super Lig |
| League strength | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1229 | 1195 |
| League minutes | 1425 (47%) | 1138 (37%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.13 | 0.08 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.19 | 0.18 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 12 | 10 |
| Market value | €7.0M | €1.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €3.6M – €10.4M | €590k – €1.6M |
| Model value | €391k – €743k | €330k – €1.1M |
| Projected value (24m) | €3.3M – €12.5M | €777k – €2.4M |
| Bargain Index | 58/100 | 79/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Low |
| Breakout probability | 14% | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€3.6M – €10.4M Model value (performance-implied)€391k – €743k Projected value (24 months)€3.3M – €12.5M Dashed line: current market value (€7.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€590k – €1.6M Model value (performance-implied)€330k – €1.1M Projected value (24 months)€777k – €2.4M Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Maestro and Bartuğ Elmaz
- Elmaz is estimated to cost far less (€1.1M vs €6.5M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Elmaz (Bargain Index 79 vs 58) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Maestro High, Elmaz Moderate.