Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Rodrigo Gomes remove | Jackson Tchatchoua remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 22 | 24 |
| Position | Right midfielder | Right midfielder |
| Club · league | Wolverhampton Wanderers · Premier League | Wolverhampton Wanderers · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1425 | 1425 |
| League minutes | 958 (28%) | 1837 (54%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.28 | 0.05 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.28 | 0.14 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 78 | 75 |
| Market value | €15.0M | €12.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €11.6M – €23.2M | €7.2M – €17.6M |
| Model value | €7.2M – €17.5M | €9.4M – €26.1M |
| Projected value (24m) | €6.6M – €19.2M | €6.2M – €16.5M |
| Bargain Index | 16/100 | 28/100 |
| Development | High | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | 12% | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Low |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€11.6M – €23.2M Model value (performance-implied)€7.2M – €17.5M Projected value (24 months)€6.6M – €19.2M Dashed line: current market value (€15.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€7.2M – €17.6M Model value (performance-implied)€9.4M – €26.1M Projected value (24 months)€6.2M – €16.5M Dashed line: current market value (€12.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Rodrigo Gomes and Jackson Tchatchoua
- Gomes has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.28 vs 0.14 per 90).
- Tchatchoua was used far more by the club (54% of minutes vs 28%).
- On value for money the model prefers Tchatchoua (Bargain Index 28 vs 16) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Gomes Moderate, Tchatchoua Low.