Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Thom van Bergen remove | Anosike Ementa remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 22 | 24 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | FC Groningen · Eredivisie | Zulte Waregem · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1248 | 1234 |
| League minutes | 2977 (97%) | 2400 (89%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.42 | 0.38 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.49 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 30 | 22 |
| Market value | €3.0M | €2.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.6M – €5.3M | €1.2M – €3.8M |
| Model value | €928k – €1.9M | €453k – €1.7M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.8M – €6.7M | €1.2M – €4.3M |
| Bargain Index | 72/100 | 31/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Low |
| Breakout probability | 24% | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.6M – €5.3M Model value (performance-implied)€928k – €1.9M Projected value (24 months)€1.8M – €6.7M Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.2M – €3.8M Model value (performance-implied)€453k – €1.7M Projected value (24 months)€1.2M – €4.3M Dashed line: current market value (€2.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Thom van Bergen and Anosike Ementa
- Ementa plays in a stronger league (0.65 vs 0.43); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
- On value for money the model prefers Bergen (Bargain Index 72 vs 31) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.