Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Mandela Keita remove | Joris Chotard remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 24 | 24 |
| Position | Defensive midfielder | Defensive midfielder |
| Club · league | Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A | Stade Brestois 29 · Ligue 1 |
| League strength | 0.93 | 0.88 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1374 | 1407 |
| League minutes | 2994 (88%) | 2777 (91%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.06 | 0.10 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 67 | 64 |
| Market value | €20.0M | €7.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €15.9M – €25.9M | €4.2M – €9.3M |
| Model value | €4.9M – €16.1M | €4.5M – €11.0M |
| Projected value (24m) | €10.7M – €28.9M | €3.8M – €10.6M |
| Bargain Index | 30/100 | 58/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Low |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€15.9M – €25.9M Model value (performance-implied)€4.9M – €16.1M Projected value (24 months)€10.7M – €28.9M Dashed line: current market value (€20.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€4.2M – €9.3M Model value (performance-implied)€4.5M – €11.0M Projected value (24 months)€3.8M – €10.6M Dashed line: current market value (€7.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Mandela Keita and Joris Chotard
- Chotard is estimated to cost far less (€6.5M vs €20.7M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Chotard (Bargain Index 58 vs 30) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.