Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Max Ejdum remove | Mads Søndergaard remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 21 | 23 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Odense Boldklub · Superliga | Viborg FF · Superliga |
| League strength | 0.47 | 0.47 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1215 | 1286 |
| League minutes | 1250 (63%) | 1080 (55%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.29 | 0.42 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.30 | 0.34 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 5 | 11 |
| Market value | €2.0M | €1.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €996k – €3.0M | €675k – €2.2M |
| Model value | €401k – €973k | €456k – €915k |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.1M – €5.1M | €961k – €3.3M |
| Bargain Index | 80/100 | 97/100 |
| Development | High | Low |
| Breakout probability | 32% | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€996k – €3.0M Model value (performance-implied)€401k – €973k Projected value (24 months)€1.1M – €5.1M Dashed line: current market value (€2.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€675k – €2.2M Model value (performance-implied)€456k – €915k Projected value (24 months)€961k – €3.3M Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Max Ejdum and Mads Søndergaard
- Søndergaard is estimated to cost far less (€901k vs €1.8M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Søndergaard (Bargain Index 97 vs 80) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.