Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Taha Altıkardeş removeDeveron Fonville remove
Age2223
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueGöztepe · Super LigNEC Nijmegen · Eredivisie
League strength0.400.43
Team strength (Elo)12811362
League minutes1378 (45%)1458 (48%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.070.12
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.070.09
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile2116
Market value€4.0M€1.5M
Estimated acquisition€1.5M – €5.1M€969k – €3.2M
Model value€332k – €988k€420k – €1.1M
Projected value (24m)€1.7M – €6.7M€864k – €3.5M
Bargain Index59/10045/100
DevelopmentModerateLow
Breakout probability13%n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€1.5M – €5.1M
Model value (performance-implied)€332k – €988k
Projected value (24 months)€1.7M – €6.7M
Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€969k – €3.2M
Model value (performance-implied)€420k – €1.1M
Projected value (24 months)€864k – €3.5M
Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Taha Altıkardeş and Deveron Fonville

  • Fonville is estimated to cost far less (€1.7M vs €3.2M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Altıkardeş (Bargain Index 59 vs 45) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.