Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Nathaniel Clyne removeChris Cadden remove
Age3529
PositionRight midfielderRight midfielder
Club · leagueCrystal Palace · Premier LeagueHibernian FC · Scottish Premiership
League strength1.300.31
Team strength (Elo)15891281
League minutes597 (18%)1149 (39%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.150.23
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.180.16
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile8331
Market value€300k€500k
Estimated acquisition€116k – €583k€123k – €393k
Model value€605k – €3.3M€534k – €1.1M
Projected value (24m)€231k – €323k€178k – €452k
Bargain IndexNo index85/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighHigh
Data confidenceLowMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€116k – €583k
Model value (performance-implied)€605k – €3.3M
Projected value (24 months)€231k – €323k
Dashed line: current market value (€300k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€123k – €393k
Model value (performance-implied)€534k – €1.1M
Projected value (24 months)€178k – €452k
Dashed line: current market value (€500k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Nathaniel Clyne and Chris Cadden

  • Cadden is 5 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Clyne plays in a stronger league (1.30 vs 0.31); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Cadden was used far more by the club (39% of minutes vs 18%).