Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Taichi Fukui remove | Edan Diop remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 21 | 21 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Left midfielder |
| Club · league | FC Arouca · Liga Portugal | Cercle Brugge · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.58 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1310 | 1325 |
| League minutes | 2531 (83%) | 2227 (83%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 38 | 35 |
| Market value | €5.0M | €3.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €2.7M – €8.4M | €1.8M – €5.7M |
| Model value | €881k – €3.6M | €933k – €5.0M |
| Projected value (24m) | €3.2M – €11.3M | €1.8M – €8.3M |
| Bargain Index | 65/100 | 54/100 |
| Development | High | High |
| Breakout probability | 31% | 37% |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€2.7M – €8.4M Model value (performance-implied)€881k – €3.6M Projected value (24 months)€3.2M – €11.3M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.8M – €5.7M Model value (performance-implied)€933k – €5.0M Projected value (24 months)€1.8M – €8.3M Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Taichi Fukui and Edan Diop
- On value for money the model prefers Fukui (Bargain Index 65 vs 54) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.