Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Noé Lebreton remove | Jakob Napoleon Romsaas remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 22 | 22 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | NEC Nijmegen · Eredivisie | Royal Charleroi Sporting Club · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1362 | 1307 |
| League minutes | 1432 (47%) | 1499 (56%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.57 | 0.30 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.41 | 0.39 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 28 | 30 |
| Market value | €4.0M | €1.2M |
| Estimated acquisition | €2.2M – €6.6M | €485k – €1.2M |
| Model value | €574k – €1.7M | €680k – €3.4M |
| Projected value (24m) | €2.0M – €9.9M | €568k – €2.6M |
| Bargain Index | 62/100 | 96/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | 25% | 25% |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€2.2M – €6.6M Model value (performance-implied)€574k – €1.7M Projected value (24 months)€2.0M – €9.9M Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€485k – €1.2M Model value (performance-implied)€680k – €3.4M Projected value (24 months)€568k – €2.6M Dashed line: current market value (€1.2M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Noé Lebreton and Jakob Napoleon Romsaas
- Romsaas plays in a stronger league (0.65 vs 0.43); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
- Romsaas is estimated to cost far less (€647k vs €4.1M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Romsaas (Bargain Index 96 vs 62) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.