Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Samu Aghehowa remove | Romeo Vermant remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 22 | 22 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | FC Porto · Liga Portugal | Club Brugge KV · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.58 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1594 | 1589 |
| League minutes | 1413 (46%) | 1070 (40%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.89 | 0.76 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.45 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 72 | 63 |
| Market value | €45.0M | €9.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €35.3M – €61.3M | €6.8M – €15.6M |
| Model value | €5.6M – €20.4M | €4.5M – €11.7M |
| Projected value (24m) | €26.0M – €54.7M | €4.3M – €20.1M |
| Bargain Index | 13/100 | 54/100 |
| Development | High | High |
| Breakout probability | 8% | 25% |
| Risk | Moderate | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€35.3M – €61.3M Model value (performance-implied)€5.6M – €20.4M Projected value (24 months)€26.0M – €54.7M Dashed line: current market value (€45.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€6.8M – €15.6M Model value (performance-implied)€4.5M – €11.7M Projected value (24 months)€4.3M – €20.1M Dashed line: current market value (€9.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Samu Aghehowa and Romeo Vermant
- Vermant is estimated to cost far less (€10.7M vs €47.4M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Vermant (Bargain Index 54 vs 13) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Aghehowa Moderate, Vermant High.