Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Diego Gómez remove | Tim Iroegbunam remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 23 | 23 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Brighton & Hove Albion · Premier League | Everton FC · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1611 | 1556 |
| League minutes | 2139 (63%) | 1486 (44%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.25 | 0.18 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 90 | 84 |
| Market value | €25.0M | €18.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €19.1M – €34.6M | €9.3M – €21.1M |
| Model value | €14.9M – €38.9M | €11.5M – €30.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €19.3M – €49.7M | €11.6M – €34.5M |
| Bargain Index | 53/100 | 86/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€19.1M – €34.6M Model value (performance-implied)€14.9M – €38.9M Projected value (24 months)€19.3M – €49.7M Dashed line: current market value (€25.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€9.3M – €21.1M Model value (performance-implied)€11.5M – €30.3M Projected value (24 months)€11.6M – €34.5M Dashed line: current market value (€18.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Diego Gómez and Tim Iroegbunam
- Gómez was used far more by the club (63% of minutes vs 44%).
- Iroegbunam is estimated to cost far less (€12.3M vs €26.9M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Iroegbunam (Bargain Index 86 vs 53) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Gómez Low, Iroegbunam Moderate.