Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Josh King remove | Jack Hinshelwood remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 19 | 21 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | Fulham FC · Premier League | Brighton & Hove Albion · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1576 | 1611 |
| League minutes | 1304 (38%) | 1751 (51%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.21 | 0.41 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.43 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 83 | 94 |
| Market value | €25.0M | €28.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €17.9M – €42.2M | €17.5M – €39.5M |
| Model value | €8.7M – €41.0M | €36.1M – €50.9M |
| Projected value (24m) | €17.5M – €49.8M | €18.9M – €49.8M |
| Bargain Index | 52/100 | 67/100 |
| Development | Very High | High |
| Breakout probability | 26% | 17% |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€17.9M – €42.2M Model value (performance-implied)€8.7M – €41.0M Projected value (24 months)€17.5M – €49.8M Dashed line: current market value (€25.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€17.5M – €39.5M Model value (performance-implied)€36.1M – €50.9M Projected value (24 months)€18.9M – €49.8M Dashed line: current market value (€28.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Josh King and Jack Hinshelwood
- Hinshelwood has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.43 vs 0.31 per 90).
- On value for money the model prefers Hinshelwood (Bargain Index 67 vs 52) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.