Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Gleiker Mendoza remove | Amar Fatah remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 24 | 22 |
| Position | Left winger | Left winger |
| Club · league | Kryvbas Kryvyi Rig · Premier Liga | Dundee United FC · Scottish Premiership |
| League strength | 0.25 | 0.31 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1219 | 1178 |
| League minutes | 2117 (78%) | 1864 (63%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.94 | 0.53 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.69 | 0.60 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 33 | 27 |
| Market value | €3.0M | €800k |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.2M – €4.1M | €312k – €958k |
| Model value | €696k – €2.4M | €665k – €1.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.4M – €5.1M | €501k – €2.1M |
| Bargain Index | 81/100 | 99/100 |
| Development | Low | High |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | 27% |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.2M – €4.1M Model value (performance-implied)€696k – €2.4M Projected value (24 months)€1.4M – €5.1M Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€312k – €958k Model value (performance-implied)€665k – €1.5M Projected value (24 months)€501k – €2.1M Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Gleiker Mendoza and Amar Fatah
- Fatah is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Mendoza has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.69 vs 0.60 per 90).
- Mendoza was used far more by the club (78% of minutes vs 63%).
- Fatah is estimated to cost far less (€416k vs €2.2M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Fatah (Bargain Index 99 vs 81) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.