Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Viktor Claesson remove | Sébastien Haller remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 34 | 32 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | FC Copenhagen · Superliga | FC Utrecht · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.47 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1359 | 1352 |
| League minutes | 1002 (51%) | 956 (31%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.36 | 0.38 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 35 | 44 |
| Market value | €1.0M | €1.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €381k – €1.4M | €262k – €1.0M |
| Model value | €192k – €967k | €505k – €1.9M |
| Projected value (24m) | €336k – €723k | €339k – €849k |
| Bargain Index | No index | 82/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | Very High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€381k – €1.4M Model value (performance-implied)€192k – €967k Projected value (24 months)€336k – €723k Dashed line: current market value (€1.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€262k – €1.0M Model value (performance-implied)€505k – €1.9M Projected value (24 months)€339k – €849k Dashed line: current market value (€1.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Viktor Claesson and Sébastien Haller
- Haller is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Claesson was used far more by the club (51% of minutes vs 31%).
- Haller is estimated to cost far less (€349k vs €593k mid-estimate).
- Risk differs: Claesson High, Haller Very High.