Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Mateus Mané removeMert Kömür remove
Age1820
PositionAttacking midfielderAttacking midfielder
Club · leagueWolverhampton Wanderers · Premier LeagueFC Augsburg · Bundesliga
League strength1.300.94
Team strength (Elo)14251421
League minutes1790 (52%)1463 (48%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.250.37
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.460.43
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile6855
Market value€20.0M€12.0M
Estimated acquisition€14.7M – €33.7M€9.0M – €19.0M
Model value€6.6M – €43.4M€2.9M – €13.4M
Projected value (24m)€14.9M – €37.5M€7.4M – €25.4M
Bargain Index65/10077/100
DevelopmentModerateVery High
Breakout probability21%42%
RiskLowModerate
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€14.7M – €33.7M
Model value (performance-implied)€6.6M – €43.4M
Projected value (24 months)€14.9M – €37.5M
Dashed line: current market value (€20.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€9.0M – €19.0M
Model value (performance-implied)€2.9M – €13.4M
Projected value (24 months)€7.4M – €25.4M
Dashed line: current market value (€12.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Mateus Mané and Mert Kömür

  • Mané is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Mané plays in a stronger league (1.30 vs 0.94); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Kömür is estimated to cost far less (€12.3M vs €23.0M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Kömür (Bargain Index 77 vs 65) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Mané Low, Kömür Moderate.