Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Tom Cairney removeOleksandr Andriyevskyi remove
Age3532
PositionCentral midfielderCentral midfielder
Club · leagueFulham FC · Premier LeagueFK Polissya Zhytomyr · Premier Liga
League strength1.300.25
Team strength (Elo)15761290
League minutes765 (22%)1826 (68%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.230.39
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.260.28
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile8440
Market value€500k€800k
Estimated acquisition€133k – €562k€0 – €258k
Model value€579k – €2.3M€388k – €718k
Projected value (24m)€238k – €593k€187k – €549k
Bargain IndexNo index38/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskVery HighHigh
Data confidenceLowMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€133k – €562k
Model value (performance-implied)€579k – €2.3M
Projected value (24 months)€238k – €593k
Dashed line: current market value (€500k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€0 – €258k
Model value (performance-implied)€388k – €718k
Projected value (24 months)€187k – €549k
Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Tom Cairney and Oleksandr Andriyevskyi

  • Andriyevskyi is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Cairney plays in a stronger league (1.30 vs 0.25); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Andriyevskyi was used far more by the club (68% of minutes vs 22%).
  • Andriyevskyi is estimated to cost far less (€43k vs €177k mid-estimate).
  • Risk differs: Cairney Very High, Andriyevskyi High.