Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Buatu removeRodrigo Abascal remove
Age3232
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueGil Vicente FC · Liga PortugalVitória Guimarães SC · Liga Portugal
League strength0.580.58
Team strength (Elo)13031361
League minutes2745 (90%)2272 (74%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.100.12
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.100.09
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile4445
Market value€600k€400k
Estimated acquisition€187k – €660k€116k – €335k
Model value€296k – €895k€422k – €1.1M
Projected value (24m)€182k – €467k€140k – €326k
Bargain Index19/10076/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€187k – €660k
Model value (performance-implied)€296k – €895k
Projected value (24 months)€182k – €467k
Dashed line: current market value (€600k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€116k – €335k
Model value (performance-implied)€422k – €1.1M
Projected value (24 months)€140k – €326k
Dashed line: current market value (€400k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Buatu and Rodrigo Abascal

  • Buatu was used far more by the club (90% of minutes vs 74%).
  • Abascal is estimated to cost far less (€155k vs €384k mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Abascal (Bargain Index 76 vs 19) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.