Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Haris Belkebla removeLassana Coulibaly remove
Age3230
PositionCentral midfielderCentral midfielder
Club · leagueAngers SCO · Ligue 1US Lecce · Serie A
League strength0.880.93
Team strength (Elo)13061352
League minutes2880 (94%)2696 (79%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.000.13
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.070.20
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile5572
Market value€1.8M€2.2M
Estimated acquisition€559k – €1.8M€547k – €1.7M
Model value€739k – €2.5M€2.9M – €7.3M
Projected value (24m)€468k – €1.1M€985k – €1.7M
Bargain Index6/10072/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateModerate
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€559k – €1.8M
Model value (performance-implied)€739k – €2.5M
Projected value (24 months)€468k – €1.1M
Dashed line: current market value (€1.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€547k – €1.7M
Model value (performance-implied)€2.9M – €7.3M
Projected value (24 months)€985k – €1.7M
Dashed line: current market value (€2.2M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Haris Belkebla and Lassana Coulibaly

  • Coulibaly is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Coulibaly has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.20 vs 0.07 per 90).
  • Belkebla was used far more by the club (94% of minutes vs 79%).
  • On value for money the model prefers Coulibaly (Bargain Index 72 vs 6) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.