Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Janik Haberer remove | Alberto Grassi remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 32 | 31 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Defensive midfielder |
| Club · league | 1.FC Union Berlin · Bundesliga | US Cremonese · Serie A |
| League strength | 0.94 | 0.93 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1392 | 1299 |
| League minutes | 1652 (54%) | 1755 (51%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.05 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.12 | 0.07 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 62 | 57 |
| Market value | €2.0M | €1.4M |
| Estimated acquisition | €509k – €1.6M | €407k – €1.1M |
| Model value | €1.1M – €2.5M | €727k – €2.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €538k – €1.5M | €392k – €1.2M |
| Bargain Index | 47/100 | 57/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€509k – €1.6M Model value (performance-implied)€1.1M – €2.5M Projected value (24 months)€538k – €1.5M Dashed line: current market value (€2.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€407k – €1.1M Model value (performance-implied)€727k – €2.3M Projected value (24 months)€392k – €1.2M Dashed line: current market value (€1.4M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Janik Haberer and Alberto Grassi
- On value for money the model prefers Grassi (Bargain Index 57 vs 47) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.