Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Joris van Overeem remove | Jeff Hardeveld remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 32 | 31 |
| Position | Defensive midfielder | Left midfielder |
| Club · league | SC Heerenveen · Eredivisie | SC Telstar · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1284 | 1216 |
| League minutes | 2933 (96%) | 2979 (97%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.34 | 0.39 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 38 | 28 |
| Market value | €1.0M | €450k |
| Estimated acquisition | €234k – €853k | €101k – €426k |
| Model value | €454k – €1.1M | €597k – €866k |
| Projected value (24m) | €346k – €839k | €225k – €406k |
| Bargain Index | 51/100 | 83/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€234k – €853k Model value (performance-implied)€454k – €1.1M Projected value (24 months)€346k – €839k Dashed line: current market value (€1.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€101k – €426k Model value (performance-implied)€597k – €866k Projected value (24 months)€225k – €406k Dashed line: current market value (€450k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Joris van Overeem and Jeff Hardeveld
- On value for money the model prefers Hardeveld (Bargain Index 83 vs 51) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Overeem High, Hardeveld Moderate.