Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Mattijs Branderhorst removeLefteris Choutesiotis remove
Age3231
PositionGoalkeeperGoalkeeper
Club · leagueFortuna Sittardia Combinatie · EredivisieAPS Atromitos Athinon · Super League 1
League strength0.430.42
Team strength (Elo)11751237
League minutes2160 (71%)1800 (77%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.000.00
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.000.00
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile2522
Market value€800k€400k
Estimated acquisition€206k – €844k€92k – €544k
Model value€253k – €555k€316k – €507k
Projected value (24m)€242k – €528k€135k – €359k
Bargain Index24/10079/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighModerate
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€206k – €844k
Model value (performance-implied)€253k – €555k
Projected value (24 months)€242k – €528k
Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€92k – €544k
Model value (performance-implied)€316k – €507k
Projected value (24 months)€135k – €359k
Dashed line: current market value (€400k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Mattijs Branderhorst and Lefteris Choutesiotis

  • Choutesiotis is estimated to cost far less (€208k vs €421k mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Choutesiotis (Bargain Index 79 vs 24) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Branderhorst High, Choutesiotis Moderate.