Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Vincent Janssen removeLudovic Ajorque remove
Age3232
PositionStrikerStriker
Club · leagueRoyal Antwerp FC · Jupiler Pro LeagueStade Brestois 29 · Ligue 1
League strength0.650.88
Team strength (Elo)13651407
League minutes2391 (89%)2824 (92%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.450.57
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.460.54
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile6783
Market value€4.0M€3.0M
Estimated acquisition€1.4M – €4.9M€997k – €2.8M
Model value€2.2M – €4.4M€3.8M – €6.9M
Projected value (24m)€890k – €2.0M€834k – €1.8M
Bargain Index0/10034/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€1.4M – €4.9M
Model value (performance-implied)€2.2M – €4.4M
Projected value (24 months)€890k – €2.0M
Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€997k – €2.8M
Model value (performance-implied)€3.8M – €6.9M
Projected value (24 months)€834k – €1.8M
Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Vincent Janssen and Ludovic Ajorque

  • Ajorque plays in a stronger league (0.88 vs 0.65); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Ajorque has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.54 vs 0.46 per 90).
  • Ajorque is estimated to cost far less (€1.3M vs €2.8M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Ajorque (Bargain Index 34 vs 0) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Janssen Moderate, Ajorque High.