Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Alessandro Deiola remove | Janik Haberer remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 30 | 32 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Cagliari Calcio · Serie A | 1.FC Union Berlin · Bundesliga |
| League strength | 0.93 | 0.94 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1376 | 1392 |
| League minutes | 1435 (42%) | 1652 (54%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.13 | 0.05 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.21 | 0.12 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 59 | 62 |
| Market value | €1.5M | €2.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €464k – €1.5M | €509k – €1.6M |
| Model value | €979k – €3.7M | €1.1M – €2.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €432k – €1.3M | €538k – €1.5M |
| Bargain Index | 68/100 | 47/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€464k – €1.5M Model value (performance-implied)€979k – €3.7M Projected value (24 months)€432k – €1.3M Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€509k – €1.6M Model value (performance-implied)€1.1M – €2.5M Projected value (24 months)€538k – €1.5M Dashed line: current market value (€2.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Alessandro Deiola and Janik Haberer
- Deiola has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.21 vs 0.12 per 90).
- On value for money the model prefers Deiola (Bargain Index 68 vs 47) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Deiola Moderate, Haberer High.