Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Ederson remove | Thomas Strakosha remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 32 | 31 |
| Position | Goalkeeper | Goalkeeper |
| Club · league | Fenerbahce · Super Lig | Athlitiki Enosi Konstantinoupoleos · Super League 1 |
| League strength | 0.40 | 0.42 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1477 | 1512 |
| League minutes | 2132 (70%) | 2340 (100%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 90 | 80 |
| Market value | €10.0M | €3.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €3.3M – €11.8M | €824k – €3.8M |
| Model value | €2.6M – €10.1M | €1.5M – €7.4M |
| Projected value (24m) | €2.1M – €5.9M | €969k – €2.3M |
| Bargain Index | 2/100 | 39/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€3.3M – €11.8M Model value (performance-implied)€2.6M – €10.1M Projected value (24 months)€2.1M – €5.9M Dashed line: current market value (€10.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€824k – €3.8M Model value (performance-implied)€1.5M – €7.4M Projected value (24 months)€969k – €2.3M Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Ederson and Thomas Strakosha
- Strakosha was used far more by the club (100% of minutes vs 70%).
- Strakosha is estimated to cost far less (€1.8M vs €7.0M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Strakosha (Bargain Index 39 vs 2) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.