Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Federico Bonazzoli remove | André Silva remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 30 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | US Cremonese · Serie A | Elche CF · Laliga |
| League strength | 0.93 | 0.95 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1299 | 1389 |
| League minutes | 2524 (74%) | 1853 (54%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.43 | 0.49 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.69 | 0.62 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 58 | 67 |
| Market value | €2.5M | €3.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.0M – €2.9M | €979k – €2.8M |
| Model value | €2.1M – €9.8M | €2.4M – €5.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.1M – €3.0M | €839k – €2.5M |
| Bargain Index | 34/100 | 54/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.0M – €2.9M Model value (performance-implied)€2.1M – €9.8M Projected value (24 months)€1.1M – €3.0M Dashed line: current market value (€2.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€979k – €2.8M Model value (performance-implied)€2.4M – €5.3M Projected value (24 months)€839k – €2.5M Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Federico Bonazzoli and André Silva
- Bonazzoli was used far more by the club (74% of minutes vs 54%).
- Silva is estimated to cost far less (€1.3M vs €2.1M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Silva (Bargain Index 54 vs 34) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Bonazzoli Low, Silva Moderate.