Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Dean Henderson remove | Guglielmo Vicario remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 29 |
| Position | Goalkeeper | Goalkeeper |
| Club · league | Crystal Palace · Premier League | Tottenham Hotspur · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1589 | 1564 |
| League minutes | 3330 (97%) | 2790 (82%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 99 | 97 |
| Market value | €28.0M | €18.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €16.4M – €38.7M | €10.5M – €25.3M |
| Model value | €22.5M – €37.9M | €12.2M – €22.0M |
| Projected value (24m) | €11.4M – €19.8M | €6.3M – €13.9M |
| Bargain Index | 1/100 | 5/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Low |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€16.4M – €38.7M Model value (performance-implied)€22.5M – €37.9M Projected value (24 months)€11.4M – €19.8M Dashed line: current market value (€28.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€10.5M – €25.3M Model value (performance-implied)€12.2M – €22.0M Projected value (24 months)€6.3M – €13.9M Dashed line: current market value (€18.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Dean Henderson and Guglielmo Vicario
- Henderson was used far more by the club (97% of minutes vs 82%).
- Vicario is estimated to cost far less (€15.8M vs €27.6M mid-estimate).