Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| David Bates remove | Takuma Ominami remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 28 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | Standard Liège · Jupiler Pro League | Oud-Heverlee Leuven · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1341 | 1329 |
| League minutes | 577 (21%) | 1121 (42%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.08 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.05 | 0.08 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 14 | 20 |
| Market value | €1.8M | €1.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €569k – €1.7M | €293k – €1.3M |
| Model value | €332k – €902k | €430k – €1.2M |
| Projected value (24m) | €461k – €1.3M | €333k – €810k |
| Bargain Index | No index | 41/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Low | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€569k – €1.7M Model value (performance-implied)€332k – €902k Projected value (24 months)€461k – €1.3M Dashed line: current market value (€1.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€293k – €1.3M Model value (performance-implied)€430k – €1.2M Projected value (24 months)€333k – €810k Dashed line: current market value (€1.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates David Bates and Takuma Ominami
- Ominami was used far more by the club (42% of minutes vs 21%).
- Ominami is estimated to cost far less (€650k vs €1.2M mid-estimate).
- Risk differs: Bates High, Ominami Moderate.