Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

David Bates removeTakuma Ominami remove
Age2928
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueStandard Liège · Jupiler Pro LeagueOud-Heverlee Leuven · Jupiler Pro League
League strength0.650.65
Team strength (Elo)13411329
League minutes577 (21%)1121 (42%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.000.08
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.050.08
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile1420
Market value€1.8M€1.0M
Estimated acquisition€569k – €1.7M€293k – €1.3M
Model value€332k – €902k€430k – €1.2M
Projected value (24m)€461k – €1.3M€333k – €810k
Bargain IndexNo index41/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighModerate
Data confidenceLowMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€569k – €1.7M
Model value (performance-implied)€332k – €902k
Projected value (24 months)€461k – €1.3M
Dashed line: current market value (€1.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€293k – €1.3M
Model value (performance-implied)€430k – €1.2M
Projected value (24 months)€333k – €810k
Dashed line: current market value (€1.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates David Bates and Takuma Ominami

  • Ominami was used far more by the club (42% of minutes vs 21%).
  • Ominami is estimated to cost far less (€650k vs €1.2M mid-estimate).
  • Risk differs: Bates High, Ominami Moderate.