Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Michael Verrips remove | Ennio van der Gouw remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 26 |
| Position | Goalkeeper | Goalkeeper |
| Club · league | FCV Dender EH · Jupiler Pro League | Rio Ave FC · Liga Portugal |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.58 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1207 | 1254 |
| League minutes | 900 (33%) | 900 (29%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 20 | 10 |
| Market value | €450k | €400k |
| Estimated acquisition | €127k – €524k | €154k – €364k |
| Model value | €277k – €1.0M | €240k – €641k |
| Projected value (24m) | €184k – €402k | €287k – €593k |
| Bargain Index | 42/100 | 89/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€127k – €524k Model value (performance-implied)€277k – €1.0M Projected value (24 months)€184k – €402k Dashed line: current market value (€450k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€154k – €364k Model value (performance-implied)€240k – €641k Projected value (24 months)€287k – €593k Dashed line: current market value (€400k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Michael Verrips and Ennio van der Gouw
- Gouw is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- On value for money the model prefers Gouw (Bargain Index 89 vs 42) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.