Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Soner Dikmen removeMaximiliano Comba remove
Age3232
PositionCentral midfielderCentral midfielder
Club · leagueAntalyaspor · Super LigVolou Neos Podosferikos Syllogos · Super League 1
League strength0.400.42
Team strength (Elo)11391129
League minutes2159 (71%)1750 (75%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.170.21
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.200.33
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile1813
Market value€700k€300k
Estimated acquisition€192k – €674k€78k – €327k
Model value€236k – €427k€210k – €317k
Projected value (24m)€189k – €490k€95k – €275k
Bargain Index36/10083/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighVery High
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€192k – €674k
Model value (performance-implied)€236k – €427k
Projected value (24 months)€189k – €490k
Dashed line: current market value (€700k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€78k – €327k
Model value (performance-implied)€210k – €317k
Projected value (24 months)€95k – €275k
Dashed line: current market value (€300k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Soner Dikmen and Maximiliano Comba

  • Comba has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.33 vs 0.20 per 90).
  • Comba is estimated to cost far less (€104k vs €378k mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Comba (Bargain Index 83 vs 36) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Dikmen High, Comba Very High.