Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Martin Ødegaard removeEberechi Eze remove
Age2728
PositionAttacking midfielderAttacking midfielder
Club · leagueArsenal FC · Premier LeagueArsenal FC · Premier League
League strength1.301.30
Team strength (Elo)18761863
League minutes1371 (40%)1900 (56%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.530.43
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.290.26
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile9999
Market value€65.0M€65.0M
Estimated acquisition€29.4M – €80.1M€26.3M – €78.9M
Model value€47.4M – €85.3M€43.1M – €85.3M
Projected value (24m)€22.7M – €52.6M€29.0M – €57.7M
Bargain Index8/10029/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateLow
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€29.4M – €80.1M
Model value (performance-implied)€47.4M – €85.3M
Projected value (24 months)€22.7M – €52.6M
Dashed line: current market value (€65.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€26.3M – €78.9M
Model value (performance-implied)€43.1M – €85.3M
Projected value (24 months)€29.0M – €57.7M
Dashed line: current market value (€65.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Martin Ødegaard and Eberechi Eze

  • Eze was used far more by the club (56% of minutes vs 40%).
  • On value for money the model prefers Eze (Bargain Index 29 vs 8) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Ødegaard Moderate, Eze Low.