Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Tammy Abraham remove | Sam Lammers remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 29 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | Beşiktaş Jimnastik Kulübü · Super Lig | FC Twente Enschede · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.40 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1417 | 1403 |
| League minutes | 1532 (45%) | 1546 (51%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.59 | 0.81 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.54 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 74 | 55 |
| Market value | €18.0M | €4.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €11.8M – €21.1M | €1.1M – €3.6M |
| Model value | €3.9M – €18.9M | €1.7M – €8.8M |
| Projected value (24m) | €4.7M – €12.7M | €1.2M – €3.4M |
| Bargain Index | 3/100 | 55/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€11.8M – €21.1M Model value (performance-implied)€3.9M – €18.9M Projected value (24 months)€4.7M – €12.7M Dashed line: current market value (€18.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.1M – €3.6M Model value (performance-implied)€1.7M – €8.8M Projected value (24 months)€1.2M – €3.4M Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Tammy Abraham and Sam Lammers
- Lammers is estimated to cost far less (€1.5M vs €14.6M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Lammers (Bargain Index 55 vs 3) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Abraham Moderate, Lammers High.