Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Joelinton remove | Daichi Kamada remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 29 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Newcastle United · Premier League | Crystal Palace · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1631 | 1589 |
| League minutes | 1956 (57%) | 1909 (56%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.14 | 0.05 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.14 | 0.09 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 97 | 93 |
| Market value | €25.0M | €10.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €10.0M – €24.5M | €2.6M – €7.9M |
| Model value | €20.5M – €37.7M | €11.2M – €18.6M |
| Projected value (24m) | €6.8M – €16.6M | €2.8M – €6.8M |
| Bargain Index | 14/100 | 40/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Low |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€10.0M – €24.5M Model value (performance-implied)€20.5M – €37.7M Projected value (24 months)€6.8M – €16.6M Dashed line: current market value (€25.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€2.6M – €7.9M Model value (performance-implied)€11.2M – €18.6M Projected value (24 months)€2.8M – €6.8M Dashed line: current market value (€10.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Joelinton and Daichi Kamada
- Kamada is estimated to cost far less (€3.4M vs €14.8M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Kamada (Bargain Index 40 vs 14) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.