Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Amos Pieper remove | Gaspar remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 28 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | SV Werder Bremen · Bundesliga | US Lecce · Serie A |
| League strength | 0.94 | 0.93 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1378 | 1352 |
| League minutes | 1504 (49%) | 1830 (54%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 64 | 58 |
| Market value | €4.0M | €3.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.6M – €5.2M | €931k – €2.6M |
| Model value | €1.9M – €6.8M | €1.3M – €5.9M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.3M – €3.4M | €1.1M – €3.1M |
| Bargain Index | 28/100 | 84/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.6M – €5.2M Model value (performance-implied)€1.9M – €6.8M Projected value (24 months)€1.3M – €3.4M Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€931k – €2.6M Model value (performance-implied)€1.3M – €5.9M Projected value (24 months)€1.1M – €3.1M Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Amos Pieper and Gaspar
- Gaspar is estimated to cost far less (€1.2M vs €3.0M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Gaspar (Bargain Index 84 vs 28) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.