Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Altay Bayındır remove | Federico Ravaglia remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 26 |
| Position | Goalkeeper | Goalkeeper |
| Club · league | Manchester United · Premier League | Bologna Football Club 1909 · Serie A |
| League strength | 1.30 | 0.93 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1715 | 1523 |
| League minutes | 540 (16%) | 1469 (43%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 84 | 58 |
| Market value | €5.0M | €1.8M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.9M – €6.1M | €834k – €2.5M |
| Model value | €7.7M – €17.7M | €2.2M – €6.4M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.9M – €5.9M | €898k – €3.4M |
| Bargain Index | No index | 70/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Low | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.9M – €6.1M Model value (performance-implied)€7.7M – €17.7M Projected value (24 months)€1.9M – €5.9M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€834k – €2.5M Model value (performance-implied)€2.2M – €6.4M Projected value (24 months)€898k – €3.4M Dashed line: current market value (€1.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Altay Bayındır and Federico Ravaglia
- Bayındır plays in a stronger league (1.30 vs 0.93); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
- Ravaglia was used far more by the club (43% of minutes vs 16%).
- Ravaglia is estimated to cost far less (€1.6M vs €2.5M mid-estimate).
- Risk differs: Bayındır High, Ravaglia Moderate.