Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Dani de Wit remove | Samu remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 30 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | FC Utrecht · Eredivisie | Vitória Guimarães SC · Liga Portugal |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.58 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1352 | 1361 |
| League minutes | 2151 (70%) | 2039 (67%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.46 | 0.44 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.36 | 0.40 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 56 | 54 |
| Market value | €3.5M | €2.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €963k – €3.6M | €795k – €1.9M |
| Model value | €1.5M – €3.7M | €1.1M – €4.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.4M – €3.6M | €843k – €2.0M |
| Bargain Index | 74/100 | 45/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€963k – €3.6M Model value (performance-implied)€1.5M – €3.7M Projected value (24 months)€1.4M – €3.6M Dashed line: current market value (€3.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€795k – €1.9M Model value (performance-implied)€1.1M – €4.3M Projected value (24 months)€843k – €2.0M Dashed line: current market value (€2.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Dani de Wit and Samu
- Samu is estimated to cost far less (€1.1M vs €1.9M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Wit (Bargain Index 74 vs 45) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Wit Low, Samu High.