Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Cengiz Ünder remove | Milot Rashica remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 30 |
| Position | Right winger | Right winger |
| Club · league | Beşiktaş Jimnastik Kulübü · Super Lig | Beşiktaş Jimnastik Kulübü · Super Lig |
| League strength | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1351 | 1350 |
| League minutes | 1173 (38%) | 975 (32%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.61 | 0.37 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.33 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 47 | 43 |
| Market value | €4.0M | €3.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.1M – €3.0M | €889k – €2.7M |
| Model value | €1.4M – €3.6M | €787k – €2.1M |
| Projected value (24m) | €934k – €3.6M | €893k – €2.7M |
| Bargain Index | 43/100 | 32/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Very High | Very High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.1M – €3.0M Model value (performance-implied)€1.4M – €3.6M Projected value (24 months)€934k – €3.6M Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€889k – €2.7M Model value (performance-implied)€787k – €2.1M Projected value (24 months)€893k – €2.7M Dashed line: current market value (€3.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Cengiz Ünder and Milot Rashica
- Ünder has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.43 vs 0.33 per 90).
- On value for money the model prefers Ünder (Bargain Index 43 vs 32) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.