Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Dayot Upamecano remove | Min-jae Kim remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 27 | 29 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | Bayern Munich · Bundesliga | Bayern Munich · Bundesliga |
| League strength | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1871 | 1871 |
| League minutes | 1798 (59%) | 1605 (53%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 99 | 97 |
| Market value | €70.0M | €20.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €52.5M – €90.8M | €11.3M – €21.5M |
| Model value | €25.3M – €61.9M | €14.6M – €45.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €30.8M – €55.5M | €7.2M – €15.6M |
| Bargain Index | 4/100 | 8/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€52.5M – €90.8M Model value (performance-implied)€25.3M – €61.9M Projected value (24 months)€30.8M – €55.5M Dashed line: current market value (€70.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€11.3M – €21.5M Model value (performance-implied)€14.6M – €45.3M Projected value (24 months)€7.2M – €15.6M Dashed line: current market value (€20.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Dayot Upamecano and Min-jae Kim
- Kim is estimated to cost far less (€16.5M vs €68.7M mid-estimate).