Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Jay-Roy Grot remove | Metehan Mimaroğlu remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 31 |
| Position | Striker | Left winger |
| Club · league | Odense Boldklub · Superliga | Gençlerbirliği Spor Kulübü · Super Lig |
| League strength | 0.47 | 0.40 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1215 | 1161 |
| League minutes | 1621 (82%) | 1974 (65%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.56 | 0.46 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.66 | 0.61 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 16 | 11 |
| Market value | €750k | €400k |
| Estimated acquisition | €224k – €665k | €89k – €286k |
| Model value | €479k – €1.1M | €339k – €640k |
| Projected value (24m) | €378k – €945k | €193k – €369k |
| Bargain Index | 94/100 | 84/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€224k – €665k Model value (performance-implied)€479k – €1.1M Projected value (24 months)€378k – €945k Dashed line: current market value (€750k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€89k – €286k Model value (performance-implied)€339k – €640k Projected value (24 months)€193k – €369k Dashed line: current market value (€400k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Jay-Roy Grot and Metehan Mimaroğlu
- Grot is 4 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Grot was used far more by the club (82% of minutes vs 65%).
- Mimaroğlu is estimated to cost far less (€118k vs €299k mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Grot (Bargain Index 94 vs 84) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.