Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Leo Østigård removeSinaly Diomandé remove
Age2625
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueGenoa CFC · Serie AAJ Auxerre · Ligue 1
League strength0.930.88
Team strength (Elo)14071402
League minutes2623 (77%)2134 (70%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.210.17
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.210.19
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile7467
Market value€13.0M€6.0M
Estimated acquisition€9.8M – €17.8M€2.5M – €6.5M
Model value€3.6M – €12.7M€3.8M – €9.4M
Projected value (24m)€5.8M – €15.1M€3.3M – €8.2M
Bargain Index17/10094/100
DevelopmentLowModerate
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskLowModerate
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€9.8M – €17.8M
Model value (performance-implied)€3.6M – €12.7M
Projected value (24 months)€5.8M – €15.1M
Dashed line: current market value (€13.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€2.5M – €6.5M
Model value (performance-implied)€3.8M – €9.4M
Projected value (24 months)€3.3M – €8.2M
Dashed line: current market value (€6.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Leo Østigård and Sinaly Diomandé

  • Diomandé is estimated to cost far less (€3.4M vs €12.7M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Diomandé (Bargain Index 94 vs 17) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Østigård Low, Diomandé Moderate.