Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Anel Ahmedhodzic remove | Ahmed Touba remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 27 | 28 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | Feyenoord Rotterdam · Eredivisie | Panathinaikos Athlitikos Omilos · Super League 1 |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.42 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1423 | 1465 |
| League minutes | 2210 (72%) | 1652 (71%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 54 | 59 |
| Market value | €10.0M | €2.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €5.2M – €11.7M | €718k – €2.9M |
| Model value | €1.4M – €2.9M | €1.1M – €3.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €4.0M – €11.1M | €1.0M – €2.7M |
| Bargain Index | 16/100 | 68/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€5.2M – €11.7M Model value (performance-implied)€1.4M – €2.9M Projected value (24 months)€4.0M – €11.1M Dashed line: current market value (€10.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€718k – €2.9M Model value (performance-implied)€1.1M – €3.5M Projected value (24 months)€1.0M – €2.7M Dashed line: current market value (€2.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Anel Ahmedhodzic and Ahmed Touba
- Touba is estimated to cost far less (€1.6M vs €9.0M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Touba (Bargain Index 68 vs 16) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Ahmedhodzic Low, Touba Moderate.