Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Noah Fadiga remove | Dean James remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 26 | 26 |
| Position | Left-back | Left-back |
| Club · league | Aris Thessalonikis · Super League 1 | Go Ahead Eagles · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.42 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1255 | 1245 |
| League minutes | 1403 (60%) | 1622 (53%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.11 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.07 | 0.10 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 29 | 23 |
| Market value | €2.0M | €1.7M |
| Estimated acquisition | €646k – €2.2M | €575k – €1.7M |
| Model value | €551k – €1.4M | €562k – €740k |
| Projected value (24m) | €735k – €2.3M | €763k – €1.7M |
| Bargain Index | 57/100 | 69/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€646k – €2.2M Model value (performance-implied)€551k – €1.4M Projected value (24 months)€735k – €2.3M Dashed line: current market value (€2.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€575k – €1.7M Model value (performance-implied)€562k – €740k Projected value (24 months)€763k – €1.7M Dashed line: current market value (€1.7M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Noah Fadiga and Dean James
- On value for money the model prefers James (Bargain Index 69 vs 57) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.