Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Omar Traoré remove | Carlens Arcus remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 30 |
| Position | Right-back | Right-back |
| Club · league | 1. Fußballclub Heidenheim 1846 · Bundesliga | Angers SCO · Ligue 1 |
| League strength | 0.94 | 0.88 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1323 | 1306 |
| League minutes | 1500 (49%) | 2045 (67%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.15 | 0.17 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 52 | 50 |
| Market value | €2.0M | €1.8M |
| Estimated acquisition | €568k – €2.2M | €452k – €1.4M |
| Model value | €1.2M – €3.5M | €1.1M – €2.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €765k – €2.1M | €575k – €1.4M |
| Bargain Index | 61/100 | 38/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€568k – €2.2M Model value (performance-implied)€1.2M – €3.5M Projected value (24 months)€765k – €2.1M Dashed line: current market value (€2.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€452k – €1.4M Model value (performance-implied)€1.1M – €2.5M Projected value (24 months)€575k – €1.4M Dashed line: current market value (€1.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Omar Traoré and Carlens Arcus
- Arcus was used far more by the club (67% of minutes vs 49%).
- Arcus is estimated to cost far less (€603k vs €1.2M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Traoré (Bargain Index 61 vs 38) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Traoré Low, Arcus Moderate.